Pathology's Changing Role in Breast Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
The pathological examination has been the gold standard for cancer diagnosis
as well as the clarification of aetiology, pathophysiology, clinicopathological
correlation, and prognosis. The introduction of modern technology, as well as
the understanding that breast cancer is heterogeneous, has changed the focus to
prognosis, with more emphasis placed on the identification of morphological and
immunohistochemical markers of prognostic significance. Despite significant
efforts, the majority of immunohistochemical biomarkers in breast cancer have
not been shown to be useful in multivariate analysis, with only the oestrogen
receptor, progesterone receptor, and Her2/neu expression remaining essential
components of the pathological examination. These three markers were first used for
prognosis, but their significance in treatment also made them predictive.
The biological examination is still the mainstay of diagnosis, especially in
the case of malignant disorders. Pathologists examine gross and microscopic
features to assess aetiology, anticipate behaviour, and give a diagnosis that
correlates with the clinical presentation of the disease. Initially, this was
done on excised specimens and was based on simple macroscopic findings
including tumour size, amount of involvement, presence of necrosis, and
presence of metastasis or vascular invasion. With the advent of less invasive
techniques, smaller samples of diseased tissue became available for
examination, and tumour behaviour prediction became increasingly centred on
microscopic features such as cell type, the extent of differentiation, mitotic
activity, microscopic lymphovascular invasion, lymphoplasmacytic reaction,
metastasis, and tumour border nature.
The pathologist's job as a diagnostic oncologist thus encompasses the
entire spectrum or continuum of cancer care, from prevention and screening to
diagnosis, prognosis, prediction of therapeutic response, and disease
monitoring. This role has recently been expanded to include molecular
components that allow for a deeper understanding of cancer development and
treatment.
This rising significance for pathology is demonstrated by the revelation
that breast cancer is not a single disease and that subgroups of breast cancer
with variable clinical outcomes may be detected visually.
The goal to provide individualised medicine in place of the old 'one
size fits all strategy, as well as complementary and supplementary to
conventional treatment modalities, has resulted in this paradigm change in
breast cancer.
The Conventional Role of pathology:
The Scarff-Bloom-Richardson grading system for breast cancer was devised
using microscopic observations based on tubule development, mitotic activity,
and cellular pleomorphism. Following refining and introduction into the
Nottingham Prognostic Index, a robust scoring system that predicted long-term
survival for breast cancer patients was developed. This and other approaches
have served as the foundation for the majority of clinical management choices
involving adjuvant therapy. However, using traditional treatment methods like surgery, chemotherapy, and radiation, it became clear that many patients
relapse after treatment and that many patients who qualify for recognised
treatment regimens or regimes do not benefit from the treatment.
It is also worth noting that the relative importance of the prognostic
variables used in the Nottingham Prognostic Index changes with time; a
prognostic feature that is highly relevant for outcome in the first year
following diagnosis may be of little consequence after 5 years. In a long-term
study of 464 breast cancer patients, it was discovered that umor diameter,
axillary lymph node status, glandular formation, and the proportion of
intraductal growth had prognostic value for up to 5 years; the mitotic index
was significant for the first 2 years, but the histological grade and morphometric
nuclear factors had only short-term value.
The Role of Pathology in the Molecular Era:
Cancer is a disease of accumulating genetic abnormalities, and
characterization of these variations is expected to help not only in
understanding the genesis of various tumours, but also in diagnosis, prognosis,
and treatment. The rapid development of high-throughput molecular technologies
has made significant contributions to breast cancer research by providing
insights into the disease's molecular complexity and a realisation that
biological heterogeneity may have implications and opportunities for new forms
of treatment.
According to the stem cell theory of cancer, tumours contain a small
number of tumour-initiating cells or cancer stem cells that drive tumour growth,
as well as populations of more differentiated nontumorigenic daughter cells
that are analogous to transit-amplifying and differentiated cells in normal
tissue. Indeed, several studies point to parallels between normal stem cells
and tumorigenic cells. Both normal stem cells and tumorigenic cells have the
ability to proliferate and give rise to new (normal or pathological) tissues.
Tumours and normal tissues are both made up of many cell populations with
varying phenotypic traits and proliferative potential.
because the majority of cancers have a clonal origin. Tumorigenic cancer
cells must produce a phenotypically varied progeny that includes cancer cells
with unlimited proliferative potential as well as cancer cells with limited or
no proliferative potential. This shows that tumorigenic cancer cells go through
mechanisms similar to normal stem cell self-renewal and differentiation.
Although some tumour heterogeneity is caused by ongoing mutagenesis, it is also
possible that heterogeneity is caused by cancer cells' abnormal
differentiation.
Pathology has traditionally focused on diagnosis, aetiology, prognosis,
and clinicopathological connections.
Prognosis has been assisted by immunohistochemical examination of
protein gene products, and three indicators, namely in breast cancer, ER, PR,
and Her2/neu (and, more recently, Ki67), are frequently evaluated as prognostic
and predictive markers.
The advancement of high-throughput technologies, as well as the advent
of molecular tools such as CGH arrays, proteomic profiling, and sequencing
technology, has opened up new areas of investigation into the genesis of breast
cancer. More crucially, it has led to the recognition that there may be new and
specially designed therapeutic options. Such advancements have defined a new
role for pathology,
which encompasses breast cancer prognosis and treatment.
Thank you….
Reach out to us: https://breastcancerpathology.universeconferences.com/
Mail:
pathology@universeconferences.com| info@utilitarianconferences.com | breastcancer@ucgconferences.com
Whatsapp: +442033222718 Call: +12073070027
Previous Blog Post
Links:-
https://kikoxp.com/posts/11632
https://www.blogger.com/blog/post/edit/3238443600245550728/724608630234676731510th World Breast Pathology and Breast Cancer Conference |
LinkedIn
https://wordpress.com/post/breastpath2022.wordpress.com/6
https://medium.com/@elizaedwards2021/breast-cancer-disease-f0324f19b8a2
https://www.blogger.com/blog/posts/3238443600245550728
https://www.reddit.com/user/breastcancerucg1/comments/th0lj8/breast_cancer_disease/
https://www.blogger.com/blog/post/edit/3238443600245550728/5272365125212681129
https://kikoxp.com/posts/10351
https://www.tumblr.com/dashboard
https://medium.com/@Andreaross01/breast-cancer-in-men-326a71409c5
https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/breast-cancer-men-dr-priya-pujhari
https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/breast-cancer-symptoms-causes-dr-priya-pujhari
https://www.blogger.com/blog/posts/7151158548968050254
https://sites.google.com/view/breast-cancer-in-men-health/home
Comments
Post a Comment